![]() Various fixes from internal audits, fuzzing and other initiatives We would also like to thank all security researchers that worked with us during the development cycle to prevent security bugs from ever reaching the stable channel.Īs usual, our ongoing internal security work was responsible for a wide range of fixes: Low CVE-2023-2941: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions API. Medium CVE-2023-2940: Inappropriate implementation in Downloads. Medium CVE-2023-2939: Insufficient data validation in Installer. Medium CVE-2023-2938: Inappropriate implementation in Picture In Picture. Medium CVE-2023-2937: Inappropriate implementation in Picture In Picture. Reported by Sergei Glazunov of Google Project Zero on High CVE-2023-2936: Type Confusion in V8. High CVE-2023-2935: Type Confusion in V8. Reported by Mark Brand of Google Project Zero on High CVE-2023-2934: Out of bounds memory access in Mojo. Reported by Quang Nguyễn of Viettel Cyber Security and Nguyen Phuong on High CVE-2023-2933: Use after free in PDF. Reported by Huyna at Viettel Cyber Security on High CVE-2023-2932: Use after free in PDF. High CVE-2023-2931: Use after free in PDF. Discovered by a member of Apple Security Engineering and Architecture (SEAR) and reported by sisu from CTF team HXP on High CVE-2023-3598: Out of bounds read and write in ANGLE. High CVE-2023-2930: Use after free in Extensions. High CVE-2023-2929: Out of bounds write in Swiftshader. Please see the Chrome Security Page for more information. Below, we highlight fixes that were contributed by external researchers. We will also retain restrictions if the bug exists in a third party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed. 131.Note: Access to bug details and links may be kept restricted until a majority of users are updated with a fix. Here are some details about current online and offline installer. However, I have downloaded both of them, and compared them with a diff tool and they appear to be binarely same. I'm not sure exactly what's the difference between the two installers offered above, but the two links do point to two different URLs. Use this installer: Alternate installer for all user accounts.Īfter you've download the installer file you need, open the file andįollow the instructions on the screen to complete your installation.įor additional help, please visit the Chrome Help Center. If you're downloading Chrome for all user accounts on your computer, Installer: Alternate installer for one user account. If you're downloading Chrome for your own user account only, use this See if updates are available by visiting the Google Chrome releasesĬhoose between two alternate installers for Chrome: To receive important security fixes and feature improvements. Manually download newer versions of Chrome. ![]() Recommended that you bookmark this page and come back periodically to However, your networkĬonfiguration may prevent the browser from updating properly. Newer version of the browser is available. Once installed,Ĭhrome will attempt to automatically update whenever it detects that a These alternate installers don’t require network connection to installĬhrome, so you can install Chrome while being offline. Using an alternate installer, available through the links below. Installer at, try downloading the browser ![]() If you're having problems downloading Chrome using the standard In this point in time, there is a Google help article about this - Alternate (offline) Google Chrome installer (Windows). If you have an 800K file it is the online installer which automatically updates. Basically speaking you're looking for the full install (30 or so MB). The accepted answer's server is the correct solution here at this point in time. FileHippo appears to only archive the online installer (automatic.I've already floated the "why are we doing this question?" and the answer is that it is part of the requirements so we need to make a best effort. If anyone has a good idea of where to start here that would be amazing. If we can get this working on a single instance then there's a possibility that a virtual machine or some other workaround will give us an easy restore point to meet this test. Obviously Google runs a silent updater which can be disabled, but at this point they don't (to my knowledge) release old archives of the MSI installers (which I can easily use to reinstall and force a no-update option for testing). I need to test a site in version, let's say, 28 of Google Chrome. I realize this requirement isn't the most logical, but politics being what they may I'd like to know the technical workaround. I have a specific requirement (probably silly!) for testing a browser of Chrome.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |